March 19, 2007
Im on my way to Japan for the second time in two years, and I wanted
to stop for a moment and do another "blog" for all of you who
like this kind of thing. Besides the introduction in the Kryon books,
its about the only time you get to hear thoughts from my mind to
yours in a personal way.
Im assuming that if you are reading this, you are a probably a metaphysical
person who is OK with what I do, or even better, you might even honor
what I do, so you find yourself on this esoteric Web site where we can
speak of channelling, angels, metaphysical healing energy and such things
in a safe place.
Im a busy guy, having made myself that way (I
take responsibility for that). I run from city to city, venue to
venue, and country to country. I have way too many projects going at once
and Im always writing another book. Currently, Im behind on
two of them that I have promised. What that causes a kind of protective
box that Im always in
surrounded by those who have come to
see me, or who are doing some kind of metaphysical business with me. Its
kind of a "bubble of New Age reality" that comes with not associating
with others of non-like consciousness. In other words, Im always
with people of like mind, so the only outside news I get about the "real"
world is on the TV and within the various news and science magazines that
I willingly watch and read to keep up with the times.
Every so often, Kryon makes me do a reality check. So the day before I
left for this current trip to still another overseas large meeting (Japan),
I took a deep breath and did what Kryon asked me to do
I typed my
name into Google and did a search. (Gasp)
The reason I always cringe is because this search creates a list of every
time my name is used anywhere that is published on the Internet. Of course,
it always pulls up the kind of odd Wikipedia page with my name that someone
wrote with incredible bias against channelling (Ive
seen that one a few times
makes we wonder about "free encyclopedias"
where anyone can write about anything). Then it also brings up
the many metaphysical and esoteric places where my books are and where
comments are published about where Ive been and where Im going
(mostly from my own Web site or those sources
that support me).
But the ones that Kryon wanted me to see are the ones that are not pleasant.
This reality check is so that I dont get a big head, and so that
every once in a while I can see what others are saying about me. I know
this is a good thing honest. Although I dont like it, and
it hurts my heart, it helps keep in check the things that need to be looked
at. At the very least, it gives me a fore-knowledge of what to have prepared
in case folks show up at a seminar with attitude or for the purpose of
causing trouble (unfortunately, this has happened
a number of times).
I found it
the heart bullet. It was from a few years ago. Its
interesting about the Web anything thats said in chat rooms
or message boards about anything is saved virtually forever! Even if the
original is long gone, Google seems to find it and display it. Think about
that the next time you write on one of these boards, by
The message was in the form of a rant against me directly and some of
my closest associates (Gregg Braden, for one).
As many of these are, it was a dialogue that was unkind, quoting things
out of context and then making fun of them, calling us "whackos"
and the like. It had follow-up from others who agreed, giving credibility
to the remarks and patting the writer on the back. They did the obligatory
Indigo Children thing, too
indicating we said they were extraterrestrials
and so on (which we never did). Ive
seen worse, but Im always taken aback by this whole process.
Im not totally uniformed about why this happens, for its prevalent
in almost every chat venue on Earth, especially in politics. I remember
that the Internet is open to the entire earth. Most of us, however, dont
go to places that represent things we are not interested in. But in another
consciousness, there are those people who seek things out that they dont
understand, then tear down another person because its easy. It also
somehow makes them feel powerful or gives them a feeling of high importance.
Its a very empty jar that they play with here
needing to be
filled up often with a continuing onslaught of insults and unfair, giddy
remarks as though they represent very smart people who somehow have an
edge on clear thinking. Its also a dark jar filled with increasing
insecurity and sadness. Those who do it regularly feel powerful, but only
for a moment. So they move forward looking for the next group of people
who they might impress with their bravado at the computer keyboard.
When I see it, my reaction is "I just dont get it." Rather
than being mad, I feel so sad that anyone would feel uplifted by this.
In my world, Im uplifted when others are! Im elevated every
time a person wins, finds themselves peaceful or in good health because
of what they have done for themselves. I dont care if they have
ever read a Kryon book. I just love to hear success stories of those who
lifted themselves up and are celebrating it. This is my joy and represents
all my teaching.
As you know, Im not evangelic, and dont care to pass my channelling
information to anyone who isnt interested in it. Thats why
its so sad to see others seek me out and blast away with unkindness.
It means they had to actually go and actively find my information, since
its not "out there" in a mainstream marketing way.
One reason Im writing this is because one of the criticisms of my
written, online channellings was notated and I realized that, indeed,
it might need some clarification not for the online, esoteric bullies,
but rather for those of you who read my site.
The person in question quoted the statement I have on every online channelling
that I publish on the Kryon Web site (www.kryon.com/channelling).
My statement before each channelling indicates that I transcribe each
one, then I "channel over the channel" for clarity. The remark
made was, "Whats wrong, didnt he get it right the first
time?" Clearly, the person isnt involved with literature of
any kind, or he would also know the value and purpose of an editor, no
matter what the written source is.
For those of you who dont know why I would do this, and who feel
that the originals should be kept exactly as the were
know that they are indeed kept, and you can actually hear them for free,
and even compare them to the re-channelled ones. This is available on
the free audio page at www.kryon.com/freeaudio.
There you will find more than 20 hours (as of
this writing) of the original channellings that we are discussing
Now, heres a fun exercise to help you understand why I do the re-channeling
after the fact. The next time you stand in front of a group (if
you are doing these things), and do any kind of impromptu kind
of speaking, record it! Then transcribe it. Then, try reading the thing.
You will suddenly see why you have to edit, and why I "overchannel"
the original for the written word. Much of what we verbalize for a group
of listeners needs clarity when written! We use the kind of language that
actually conveys a covert, silent understanding. We often use facial cues,
gestures of understanding, often leave out the subject in the next sentence,
and even stray away from clarity. This is really obvious when you read
it in the original form. Its for ears, not eyes.
So in each case, I channel over the channel. It enhances the message and
clears up the parts that are not complete. So everything that is done
in this way is to make the message more understandable. The information
is never changed, but instead added unto. In my opinion, this is not only
logical, but fair and clear of any other intent other than to help the
reader and give them a better read. So this is an explanation of why this
is done. In addition, you are often free to compare it to the original
on the same Web site.
Finally, this critique of my work (and that
of Gregg Braden) I am referring to was apparently "science
based," like it was some kind of science club or association, or
online amateur science group. This is what really made this odd
for Gregg is a scientist himself and an aerospace engineer. As for me,
I carry with me on the road an M.D. scientist researcher, two Ph.D.s and
numerous other professionals who are not "whackos." I just like
to make the point that I do not stand alone in the things I teach, and
that there are many around me who are far smarter than I, who understand
that the esoterics of today might very well be tomorrows science*.
This, of course, is exactly what has been happening for the last 100 years
or so, but this fact somehow escapes those who would take us to task for
Also, the question I always wish to ask these guys is, if indeed Im
so incredibly out of touch with everything around me, why did the SEAT
group at the United Nations seek out this information from Kryon, inviting
me back six times over a decade to speak and channel at the UN (the
latest being a few weeks ago)? I guess they are all "whackos,"
Perhaps Im now getting defensive, huh? Well, perhaps its time
some things were spoken that need to be said. I dont do it often.
Blessings to all of you!
Some of the Kryon discussions and/or validations
spanning 18 years, just for the record:
String Theory, qualified by Scientific American, December 2002. Kryons
teaching is that we are interdimensional and our DNA has at least 12 interdimensional
"energies" a Kryon subject since 1989.
Large magnetic grid shifts Current
geological fact, confirmed by CNN and others. This is the premise of Kryons
coming in 1989, when talk of magnetic shift was nothing current.
Weather Shifts Basic Kryon information
from 1989. Need a source?
Indigo Children (not
extraterrestrials!) Discourse from many professional sources,
including those of sociologists, that human consciousness is actually
changing, and that the current barrage of ADD and ADHD in our kids is
Current events Todays complete
variance from accepted prophesy, including Nostradomus, a la
Armageddon didnt happen (if anyone noticed).
Biology Kryons comments
in 1989 about how altering the magnetic properties between the "lock
and key" mechanisms of disease could cure AIDS, as well as cancer.
This is the basis behind some current research today. It was originally
presented in Kryon Book I. It has been proven to be absolutely correct.
Anthropic Principal Idea among
astronomers and physicists that the Universe was created by an intelligent
source of some kind (November 29, 2004, Time
magazine). (Kryons teachings from 1989)
DNA has an interdimensional field
Confirmed by the work of Vladamir Poponin, Russian scientist. "Phantom
DNA" is what he called it
the idea that DNAs influence
keeps going after its gone. (Kryons
teaching since the beginning). [http://twm.co.nz/DNAPhantom.htm]
Thought changes matter Proven
in the crystallization labs of Dr. Emoto and the Hado Institute in Japan,
as well as featured in the March 3, 2005, Time magazine about the reality
of the placebo effect. (This is basic Kryon
information about healing, using your own thoughts.).
Base 12 Has been shown to be the
math of the ancients, including the Summerians. Base-12 is the way time
works, as well as many Earth sciences, navigation (360 degrees), time
itself, the calendars of the planet, and even the structure of DNA. All
crystallized forms come up in base-12 attributes (including
snowflakes), using the 5 factors of 12. With so much profundity around
it, how can its validity be so quickly thrown away? Since 1993, Kryon
has told us that base-12 is the higher math of the Universe).
Your thoughts can change your immune system
Confirmed cover of Time magazine, January 20, 2003. (Kryon
information from the beginning). [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,1101030120,00.html]
The speed of light is only the 3D speed limit
of your reality Basic Kryon information since 1989, now
seen to be so with "entanglement" communication at the
quantum level that is at least 10,000 times the speed of light. (Discover
magazine, February 2003). NASA is working with it now, teleporting
electrons from one place to another. [http://discovermagazine.com/2002/nov/featreviews/]
The Big Bang may not have happened
Also challenged in Discover magazine, February 2004 issue, as a collision
exactly what Kryon told us more than a decade ago.